America's Healthcare System Ranks The Lowest Among Industrialized Nations

The U.S. doesn't get its money's worth when itpercent of Americans surveyed found it
comes to healthcare, according to recent"somewhat" or "very difficult" to receive care on
statistics. The Commonwealth Fund released anights or weekends.
report earlier this month on America's ranking inWhat is most shocking perhaps, is the relatively
the world healthcare system -- and it wasn't good.high infant mortality rate, at 5 in every 1,000. The
According to the report, residents of the UnitedU.S. is tied with Poland, Hungary, Malta, and
States receive the poorest quality of care, yetSlovakia for this statistic, and, among the 32
pay the most for it, among six of the topindustrialized nations surveyed, ranked only above
industrialized nations, including Germany, GreatLatvia, at 6 in every 1,000 births. Japan, the
Britain, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. TheCzech Republic, Finland, Iceland, and Norway beat
findings were based on measures including quality,the U.S. by a landslide, at approximately one-third
access, efficiency, equity, and outcomes ofthe death rate. Every year, 16,000 newborn
healthcare. Germany took the overall first placedeaths occur in this country, mostly linked with
ranking, followed by Great Britain, Australia, Newlow birth weights and premature delivery. This
Zealand, and Canada.suggests a surprising lack of prenatal care and,
While the other five nations on the list provideindeed, measures of mothers' well-being ranks
universal healthcare, the U.S., with its unorganizedextremely low in comparison to other
mixture of employer-funded care, privateindustrialized nations.
insurance, and government programs, leavesAfrican-Americans suffer almost twice the
nearly 48 million throughout the country with nonational average of infant mortality, at 9 in every
insurance whatsoever. Ominously, the Fund also1,000 -- which is closer to developing nations'
linked lack of insurance with poorer quality of carestatistics than to industrialized ones. Black babies
in another report released this month.born in the U.S. are also twice as likely to be
Texas ranks at the very bottom of the nation inpremature and have a low birth rate than their
numbers of people left uninsured, at just overwhite counterparts.
25%. With high incidences of poverty,Throw in scandals -- like drug companies enticing
unemployment, and chronic diseases, such asdoctors with "free" gifts and dinners to sell their
diabetes, the state stands to gain more thanmedications, or multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical
most by measures to update the healthcare andcompany investments in medical schools -- and it
or to make insurance available to more of thelooks like a gloomy picture, indeed. Michael Moore's
population. Most of those lacking insurance do notsummer release of Sicko, though sure to be
receive pertinent preventative care, resulting incontroversial, undeniably raises a subject on the
increased long-term costs to health, as well as tonational consciousness.
the state and federal governments.While it is painfully obvious that something must
Particularly in the larger cities of Dallas, Houston,be done -- and quickly -- the next step is not so
and Austin -- where many from rural areas of theclear. States such as Hawaii and Massachusetts
state come seeking care, overburdening thehave taken their own initiatives with
system further -- change would be welcomed.state-provided health insurance, resulting in nearly
Activists and members of Congress are calling for90% of their residents having insurance, and
an overhaul of the overburdened and outdatedtherefore better access to care. California has
system, with suggestions ranging from institutingdebated its own measures, as well as many
America's own universal healthcare, to subsidizingMidwestern states.
private insurance companies in order to makeIt's not a straight-forward debate, by any means.
healthcare coverage available to all, regardless ofWhile nations providing universal healthcare rank
income.higher in overall standings, the U.S. is still
Obviously, it's an issue that needs to be closelyconsidered a leader when it comes to
analyzed, as it is "pretty undisputable that webreakthrough technologies and treatment options.
spend twice what other countries spend onA balance must be struck between revolutionary
average," as reported by The Commonwealthresearch and making sure more people actually
Fund. While, in comparison to other industrializedhave access to its results. Reports on new HIV
nations, the U.S. has the fewest patients seeing adrugs, for instance, hint that turning HIV and AIDS
regular doctor (16%), is the least wired (workinginto a chronic, versus fatal, condition is just around
with the fewest electronic records, and receivingthe corner...but those medications are expensive,
the fewest electronic updates on diseaseand not everyone in the U.S. has access to them.
treatment options), and has one of the highestResidents of the U.S., however, have done little to
infant mortality rates, we are actually spendingpush the initiative. The surprising lack of attention
twice as much per capita on healthcare ason the issue in political debates reflects the fact
Germany, at $6,102. Canada spends $3,165 perthat voters do not choose their candidate
capita, Australia $2,876, Britain $2,546, and Newprimarily based on his or her plans for future
Zealand $2,083.healthcare reform. And, time and again, it has
The U.S. also has one of the longest emergencybeen proven that the masses' outspoken push for
room waiting times, takes an average of fourmeasures is what gets things done on Capitol Hill.
months to deliver elective surgery, and isIn the end, it's really time for us -- the people --
considered one of the less "convenient" nationsto decide how to dig ourselves out of this one.
when it comes to general healthcare. Sixty-one