Chiropractic Versus The AMA

For many years, chiropractors were labeled asthroughout the 1980s culminating in a Supreme
quacks by the established medical community.Court decision in 1990 that supported an earlier
Only in recent years have medical doctors starteddecision that found the AMA guilty of illegally
to work with chiropractors instead of having aboycotting and conspiring against the chiropractic
confrontational relationship with them. The basicprofession. The lawsuits didn't establish the
theory behind chiropractic is that subluxations arescientific validity of chiropractic medicine but they
the cause of many, if not most, medical problems.did allow chiropractors to continue their practice
Subluxations are defined as misalignments in thewithout medical doctor interference. Despite
spine or other skeletal structures that may causeimprovements in the relation between medical
blocked and impaired nerve functions. The idea isdoctors and chiropractors since then,
that if a chiropractor realigns the spine thenchiropractors are still not a normal established part
normal nerve pathways will be restored and goodof the medical staffs at hospitals and medical
health will be the result for the patient. However,clinics. Chiropractors usually work out of their own
there is no scientific evidence that supports thesebuildings and organizations separate from medical
theories and this is why medical doctors weredoctors' facilities. Occasionally a doctor will refer a
opposed to chiropractic. All the studies made inpatient to a chiropractor and vice versa but there
support of chiropractic are basically testimonialsis no clearly established working relationship
from patients. The chiropractor aligns the patient'sbetween the two.
spine and the patient "says" he feels better.Part of the problem is that the established medical
Whether or not the alignment is the direct andprofession has for many years been opposed to
only cause of the patient's restored health hasall other alternative forms of medicine, valid or
not been scientifically established.not. Science was not the real legal issue. They
In the 1970s the American Medical Associationactively tried to contain and eliminate competition,
(AMA), which is the main governing body forwhich is against the law. The AMA has enjoyed its
medical doctors in the USA, officially condemnedmonopoly of the health profession industry and
and labeled chiropractic as a cult and quackery.has zealously tried to defend it against all other
The AMA actually had a section in its writtenapproaches whether it be acupuncture,
Medical Code of Ethics that prevented medicalhomeopathy, chiropractic or any other form of
doctors from associating with chiropractors in anyhealth care that does not buy into the surgery
way, shape or form. Also, the AMA's Committeeand drugs culture of the established medical
on Quackery was working hard to discreditcommunity.
chiropractic by preventing coverage andThe biggest losers in all of this unfortunately have
recognition in all federal and state governmentbeen the patients. If a spirit of cooperation and
agencies. The chiropractors, in return, sued thelearning had been fostered between doctors and
AMA claiming that the condemnation restrictedchiropractors instead of antagonism there would
free trade, and they won the lawsuit. Lawsuitsundoubtedly be a much stronger infrastructure
between the AMA and chiropracters continuedtoday for providing health care to patients.