Detroit Medical Center – Wayne State University Joint Residency Programs: Progress Made, But Work Remains

On November 22, 2006, the Detroit MedicalDMC and WSU.  A small number of the residency
Center (“DMC”) and Wayne Stateprograms will be solely sponsored by either DMC
University (“WSU”) announced aor WSU, provided the new solely sponsored
temporizing resolution to a long-standingprograms are able to obtain ACGME
contractual dispute.  This dispute threatened bothaccreditation.  Additionally, after June 30, 2008,
the future of the DMC/WSU jointly sponsoredeither DMC or WSU may apply for sole
residency programs and patient access to qualitysponsorship of a number of residency programs
care in Michigan.  The resolution, in the form of anot strictly tied to the Hospital sites. 
legally binding “Memorandum of- DMC will pay WSU up to $8.8 million in
Understanding,” provided basic provisions toperformance bonuses and recruitment support.
serve as the framework for a final, definitive- DMC and WSU agree to focus on their
agreement between the parties in the future. partnership for 18 months, and not “pursue
This article will address the dispute between DMCnew competitive activities that would disrupt the
and WSU from the perspective of residentpartnership.”  However, the WSU Physician
training (also known as “graduate medicalGroup is permitted to partner with Oakwood
education”); the current status of the DMCHealth System to open an ambulatory care
WSU jointly-sponsored residency programs ascenter in Troy, Michigan.  See Memorandum of
defined by the Memorandum of Understanding;Understanding, DMC/WSU 2006.
and the residents’ role in effectuating aThe Memorandum of Understanding was a critical
resolution of the dispute between DMC and WSU.step, which was recognized by the ACGME, which
The Dispute and Effect on Resident Trainingsubsequently granted a two-year institutional
DMC and WSU, working in partnership, havereaccreditation.  While this secures some degree
enjoyed a rich tradition of providing physicianof stability for the DMC/WSU residency
training for decades.  Roughly 1000 residents inprograms, it should be noted that the typical
nearly 70 accredited specialty and subspecialtyrenewal of accreditation occurs every four to five
training programs have the opportunity to receiveyears.  Also, the ACGME issued several citations
university-based residency training from theand identified issues that needed to be addressed
renowned faculty of WSU, while providing clinicalin a progress report by DMC/WSU, including a
services to meet the challenging medical needs ofstatement of institutional commitment to the
the patient community seen in the Detroit DMCresidency programs.  This report has been
hospitals.  This DMC/WSU resident workforcesubmitted and will be evaluated in April 2007.  If
provides a significant contribution to primarythe progress report is inadequate, or if other
healthcare within Detroit and plays a vital role inadditional areas of concern evolve, the DMC/WSU
the health care safety net for the uninsured andresidency programs may be subject to an
underinsured.additional ACGME review before the scheduled
While partnership has clear benefits for medicaltimeframe, with accreditation again placed at risk.
education and clinical service, disputes betweenWhile the Memorandum of Understanding does
DMC and WSU arose surrounding multiple issues. demonstrate progress, it does have noticeable
Areas of disagreement included the paymentshortcomings.  This document, which is thirteen
structure for medical training and clinical carepages (including signatures and attachments), does
provided by WSU physicians, the ability of thenot articulate many of the details of the
parties to work together under non-exclusiveanticipated final contract.  As in the interpretation
arrangements, and control of various residentof any contract, DMC and WSU could interpret its
training programs which have historically beenprovisions differently, which may impede
co-sponsored between the institutions.negotiations as the parties make efforts to enter
Casualties of this conflict were first announced ininto a formal final agreement.  As of this writing,
April 2006, when inability to achieve contractualno finalized contract between DMC and WSU
agreement at that time resulted in a nine monthexists.
contract extension.  This extension was unable toDMC/WSU Residents Played A Key Role in
rectify core differences between the parties,Effectuating a Resolution
which led to the discontinuation of the orthopedicAs noted above, achieving the temporizing
surgery residency program.  This program wasagreement in the Memorandum of Understanding
the second largest orthopedic residency in thewas the result of influence from multiple parties. 
Midwest and had received national recognition forThe DMC/WSU residents played a particularly
their contribution to trauma surgical care.  At theimportant role in effectuating a resolution to the
DMC’s discretion, the state and federaldispute between their co-sponsors.
funding paid to them for resident training was notEarly in the process the DMC/WSU residents
released to follow these residents to newrealized that they were very important
programs, despite Michigan State Medical Societystakeholders in the outcome of the negotiations,
and the American Medical Association positionsas apparent from the potential jeopardy placed on
urging such temporary transfer of funds upontheir continued training in an ACGME accredited
residency program closure.  As a result,program.  Notably, the completion of an
twenty-four DMC/WSU orthopedic residents wereACGME-accredited residency program is a
forced to seek other accredited programs thatcondition for medical board eligibility.  However,
would be also willing to incur the cost of theirloss of institutional accreditation would have likely
training, and relocate by July 2006.  Theseresulted in the discontinuation of DMC/WSU
residents, who initially chose to pursue theirresidency programs altogether.  With their
medical training in Detroit in good faith, weretraining at risk, residents felt that they should be
ultimately dispersed throughout the state andafforded an opportunity for input in the
country.negotiation process.
Several months later, it became clear that thereOnce it appeared that contract negotiations
was little progress in contract negotiations,between DMC and WSU had stalled, residents
jeopardizing the remaining residents who relied onemployed several means to communicate their
both sponsors for their continued residentpositions to DMC and WSU.  This began with
training.  This was recognized by the accreditingformal letters to institutional leadership defining the
body for graduate medical education, theresident role as a neutral third party in contract
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medicalnegotiations, with support for the continuation of
Education (“ACGME”), which mandatestheir current co-sponsored graduate medical
that all residency programs demonstrateeducation.  These correspondences continually
adequate institutional support for resident trainingemphasized the risk to their own training, as well
in an environment conducive to medical educationas to those patients who required their medical
and clinical care.services.  They involved the media, had a press
Throughout months of interaction, the ACGMErelease, and held rallies attended by an estimated
requested documentation detailing how resident400 residents and medical students, to articulate
education and well-being was to be preserved,the need for a DMC and WSU agreement to the
and held an onsite review of the institution toinstitution as well as the public.
evaluate the long term stability of the institutionalAdditionally, the residents obtained independent
agreements to date.  If these conditions werelegal counsel of Wachler & Associates, P.C. 
not satisfactory, the ACGME was empowered toThe residents and their legal counsel provided the
withdrawal accreditation at special meeting held inGovernor’s appointed mediator, Mr. Fink,
the end of November 2006.  Had the DMC/WSUposition papers and additional information regarding
institution lost ACGME accreditation, all DMC/WSUthe residents’ legal rights afforded to the
residency programs likely would have beenresidents through the resident contract with the
discontinued, resulting in the mass relocation ofDMC/WSU.  Notably, all residents are afforded
nearly 20 percent of Michigan’s residentrights pursuant to their individual residency
workforce out of a single health system.  Thisagreements.  Pursuant to the standard DMC
relocation would have been at the personal,WSU residency agreement for the 2006-07
professional, and financial expense of eachacademic year, the DMC/WSU institution has a
individual resident.  However, there would havecontractual obligation to provide all co-sponsored
been a higher cost to the community, which isresidents with a jointly sponsored,
comprised of many who are already medicallyACGME-accredited training program.  Breach of
underserved and depend on the DMC forthe DMC/WSU residency agreements would have
provision of care.resulted in substantial damages to the DMC/WSU
The Resolutionresidents, potentially including lost wages (both
The fear of the termination of DMC/WSUcurrent and future earnings), relocation costs,
partnership and their cosponsored residencyemotional damages, etc.  Based upon their
programs invoked active involvement fromcommunications with the negotiation mediator, the
numerous parties, including the Wayne StateDMC/WSU residents were able to lend their
University Board of Governors, the Detroit Medicalinsight and concerns to the negotiation process.
Center Board of Trustees, DMC/WSU residents,Further, the residents’ communications with
WSU School of Medicine students, medicalDMC and WSU leadership ultimately led to the
societies representing both Wayne County andinstitutional recognition of the residents’
the State of Michigan, Detroit Mayor Kwamerights.  For example, during and subsequent to
Kilpatrick, and Michigan Governor Jenniferthe contract negotiations between DMC and WSU,
Granholm, among others.  David Fink wasthe DMC/WSU residency programs worked to
appointed by Governor Granholm to mediate thesubstantially revise the standard residency
negotiations in early November.agreement that the DMC/WSU residency
The outcome of this concerted effort wasprograms routinely entered into with residents. 
realized at a press conference called by GovernorAlthough several changes to the standard
Granholm on November 22, 2006, where DMCresidency agreement were enacted for the
and WSU announced that they finally had reached2007-08 academic year, DMC/WSU reaffirmed
agreement in the form of a binding Memorandumtheir support for residents by expressly including
of Understanding, which became effective Januarythat the institutional responsibilities included
1, 2007.  This document provided an outline ofproviding ACGME-accredited educational training
the main provisions that the parties would finalizeprograms.  Thus, DMC/WSU is contractually
at a later date in an executed final contract.obligated to the DMC/WSU residents to provide
Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding,medical education and clinical exposure in
which addresses the teaching, clinical, andsubstantial compliance with ACGME requirements.
administrative arrangements between DMC andIn summary, though the intermediate solution to
WSU, the initial term of the agreement betweenthe dispute between DMC and WSU may be
DMC and WSU is for 3-1/2 years.  Following thisimperfect, the Memorandum of Understanding as
3-1/2 year initial term, the contract will beadopted by the parties provides a framework for
automatically extended for an additional year,the future relationship between the DMC and
unless either party gives 18 months’ notice ofWSU.  However, it is essential that the DMC
intent not to renew.  Other key provisions of theWSU institution take the necessary steps to
agreement include the following:provide adequate support to the existing DMC
- DMC will allocate and pay to WSU $76 million perWSU residency programs, as defined by the
year for clinical, teaching and administrativeACGME.  To achieve this end, and meet the
services. contractual obligation to its residents, it is
- All of the 68 current graduate medical residencyimperative that DMC and WSU enter into a final
programs will be continued until at least 2009. written agreement enacting the terms of the
Notably, however, not all of these residencyMemorandum of Understanding.
programs will remain jointly sponsored by both