Detroit Medical Center

td>residency programs will be continued until at least
On November 22, 2006, the Detroit Medical2009. Notably, however, not all of these residency
Center (“DMC”) and Wayne State Universityprograms will remain jointly sponsored by both
(“WSU”) announced a temporizing resolutionDMC and WSU. A small number of the residency
to a long-standing contractual dispute. This disputeprograms will be solely sponsored by either DMC
threatened both the future of the DMC/WSUor WSU, provided the new solely sponsored
jointly sponsored residency programs and patientprograms are able to obtain ACGME accreditation.
access to quality care in Michigan. The resolution,Additionally, after June 30, 2008, either DMC or
in the form of a legally binding “MemorandumWSU may apply for sole sponsorship of a number
of Understanding,” provided basic provisions toof residency programs not strictly tied to the
serve as the framework for a final, definitiveHospital sites.
agreement between the parties in the future. This DMC will pay WSU up to $8.8 million in
article will address the dispute between DMC andperformance bonuses and recruitment support.
WSU from the perspective of resident training DMC and WSU agree to focus on their
(also known as “graduate medicalpartnership for 18 months, and not “pursue
education”); the current status of the DMCnew competitive activities that would disrupt the
WSU jointly-sponsored residency programs aspartnership.” However, the WSU Physician
defined by the Memorandum of Understanding;Group is permitted to partner with Oakwood
and the residents’ role in effectuating aHealth System to open an ambulatory care
resolution of the dispute between DMC and WSU.center in Troy, Michigan. See Memorandum of
The Dispute and Effect on Resident TrainingUnderstanding, DMC/WSU 2006.
DMC and WSU, working in partnership, haveThe Memorandum of Understanding was a critical
enjoyed a rich tradition of providing physicianstep, which was recognized by the ACGME, which
training for decades. Roughly 1000 residents insubsequently granted a two-year institutional
nearly 70 accredited specialty and subspecialtyreaccreditation. While this secures some degree of
training programs have the opportunity to receivestability for the DMC/WSU residency programs, it
university-based residency training from theshould be noted that the typical renewal of
renowned faculty of WSU, while providing clinicalaccreditation occurs every four to five years.
services to meet the challenging medical needs ofAlso, the ACGME issued several citations and
the patient community seen in the Detroit DMCidentified issues that needed to be addressed in a
hospitals. This DMC/WSU resident workforceprogress report by DMC/WSU, including a
provides a significant contribution to primarystatement of institutional commitment to the
healthcare within Detroit and plays a vital role inresidency programs. This report has been
the health care safety net for the uninsured andsubmitted and will be evaluated in April 2007. If
underinsured.the progress report is inadequate, or if other
While partnership has clear benefits for medicaladditional areas of concern evolve, the DMC/WSU
education and clinical service, disputes betweenresidency programs may be subject to an
DMC and WSU arose surrounding multiple issues.additional ACGME review before the scheduled
Areas of disagreement included the paymenttimeframe, with accreditation again placed at risk.
structure for medical training and clinical careWhile the Memorandum of Understanding does
provided by WSU physicians, the ability of thedemonstrate progress, it does have noticeable
parties to work together under non-exclusiveshortcomings. This document, which is thirteen
arrangements, and control of various residentpages (including signatures and attachments), does
training programs which have historically beennot articulate many of the details of the
co-sponsored between the institutions.anticipated final contract. As in the interpretation
Casualties of this conflict were first announced inof any contract, DMC and WSU could interpret its
April 2006, when inability to achieve contractualprovisions differently, which may impede
agreement at that time resulted in a nine monthnegotiations as the parties make efforts to enter
contract extension. This extension was unable tointo a formal final agreement. As of this writing,
rectify core differences between the parties,no finalized contract between DMC and WSU
which led to the discontinuation of the orthopedicexists.
surgery residency program. This program was theDMC/WSU Residents Played A Key Role in
second largest orthopedic residency in theEffectuating a Resolution
Midwest and had received national recognition forAs noted above, achieving the temporizing
their contribution to trauma surgical care. At theagreement in the Memorandum of Understanding
DMC’s discretion, the state and federalwas the result of influence from multiple parties.
funding paid to them for resident training was notThe DMC/WSU residents played a particularly
released to follow these residents to newimportant role in effectuating a resolution to the
programs, despite Michigan State Medical Societydispute between their co-sponsors.
and the American Medical Association positionsEarly in the process the DMC/WSU residents
urging such temporary transfer of funds uponrealized that they were very important
residency program closure. As a result,stakeholders in the outcome of the negotiations,
twenty-four DMC/WSU orthopedic residents wereas apparent from the potential jeopardy placed on
forced to seek other accredited programs thattheir continued training in an ACGME accredited
would be also willing to incur the cost of theirprogram. Notably, the completion of an
training, and relocate by July 2006. TheseACGME-accredited residency program is a
residents, who initially chose to pursue theircondition for medical board eligibility. However, loss
medical training in Detroit in good faith, wereof institutional accreditation would have likely
ultimately dispersed throughout the state andresulted in the discontinuation of DMC/WSU
country.residency programs altogether. With their training
Several months later, it became clear that thereat risk, residents felt that they should be afforded
was little progress in contract negotiations,an opportunity for input in the negotiation process.
jeopardizing the remaining residents who relied onOnce it appeared that contract negotiations
both sponsors for their continued resident training.between DMC and WSU had stalled, residents
This was recognized by the accrediting body foremployed several means to communicate their
graduate medical education, the Accreditationpositions to DMC and WSU. This began with
Council for Graduate Medical Educationformal letters to institutional leadership defining the
(“ACGME”), which mandates that allresident role as a neutral third party in contract
residency programs demonstrate adequatenegotiations, with support for the continuation of
institutional support for resident training in antheir current co-sponsored graduate medical
environment conducive to medical education andeducation. These correspondences continually
clinical care.emphasized the risk to their own training, as well
Throughout months of interaction, the ACGMEas to those patients who required their medical
requested documentation detailing how residentservices. They involved the media, had a press
education and well-being was to be preserved,release, and held rallies attended by an estimated
and held an onsite review of the institution to400 residents and medical students, to articulate
evaluate the long term stability of the institutionalthe need for a DMC and WSU agreement to the
agreements to date. If these conditions were notinstitution as well as the public.
satisfactory, the ACGME was empowered toAdditionally, the residents obtained independent
withdrawal accreditation at special meeting held inlegal counsel of Wachler & Associates, P.C. The
the end of November 2006. Had the DMC/WSUresidents and their legal counsel provided the
institution lost ACGME accreditation, all DMC/WSUGovernor’s appointed mediator, Mr. Fink,
residency programs likely would have beenposition papers and additional information regarding
discontinued, resulting in the mass relocation ofthe residents’ legal rights afforded to the
nearly 20 percent of Michigan’s residentresidents through the resident contract with the
workforce out of a single health system. ThisDMC/WSU. Notably, all residents are afforded
relocation would have been at the personal,rights pursuant to their individual residency
professional, and financial expense of eachagreements. Pursuant to the standard DMC/WSU
individual resident. However, there would haveresidency agreement for the 2006-07 academic
been a higher cost to the community, which isyear, the DMC/WSU institution has a contractual
comprised of many who are already medicallyobligation to provide all co-sponsored residents
underserved and depend on the DMC forwith a jointly sponsored, ACGME-accredited
provision of care.training program. Breach of the DMC/WSU
The Resolutionresidency agreements would have resulted in
The fear of the termination of DMC/WSUsubstantial damages to the DMC/WSU residents,
partnership and their cosponsored residencypotentially including lost wages (both current and
programs invoked active involvement fromfuture earnings), relocation costs, emotional
numerous parties, including the Wayne Statedamages, etc. Based upon their communications
University Board of Governors, the Detroit Medicalwith the negotiation mediator, the DMC/WSU
Center Board of Trustees, DMC/WSU residents,residents were able to lend their insight and
WSU School of Medicine students, medicalconcerns to the negotiation process.
societies representing both Wayne County andFurther, the residents’ communications
the State of Michigan, Detroit Mayor Kwamewith DMC and WSU leadership ultimately led to
Kilpatrick, and Michigan Governor Jenniferthe institutional recognition of the residents’
Granholm, among others. David Fink wasrights. For example, during and subsequent to the
appointed by Governor Granholm to mediate thecontract negotiations between DMC and WSU, the
negotiations in early November.DMC/WSU residency programs worked to
The outcome of this concerted effort wassubstantially revise the standard residency
realized at a press conference called by Governoragreement that the DMC/WSU residency
Granholm on November 22, 2006, where DMCprograms routinely entered into with residents.
and WSU announced that they finally had reachedAlthough several changes to the standard
agreement in the form of a binding Memorandumresidency agreement were enacted for the
of Understanding, which became effective January2007-08 academic year, DMC/WSU reaffirmed
1, 2007. This document provided an outline of thetheir support for residents by expressly including
main provisions that the parties would finalize at athat the institutional responsibilities included
later date in an executed final contract.providing ACGME-accredited educational training
Pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding,programs. Thus, DMC/WSU is contractually
which addresses the teaching, clinical, andobligated to the DMC/WSU residents to provide
administrative arrangements between DMC andmedical education and clinical exposure in
WSU, the initial term of the agreement betweensubstantial compliance with ACGME requirements.
DMC and WSU is for 3-1/2 years. Following thisIn summary, though the intermediate solution to
3-1/2 year initial term, the contract will bethe dispute between DMC and WSU may be
automatically extended for an additional year,imperfect, the Memorandum of Understanding as
unless either party gives 18 months’ noticeadopted by the parties provides a framework for
of intent not to renew. Other key provisions ofthe future relationship between the DMC and
the agreement include the following:WSU. However, it is essential that the DMC/WSU
 DMC will allocate and pay to WSU $76institution take the necessary steps to provide
million per year for clinical, teaching andadequate support to the existing DMC/WSU
administrative services.residency programs, as defined by the ACGME.
 All of the 68 current graduate medical