Facts And Fallacies Of Fitness By Mel Siff Intro

Toe-touching is dangerous. Squats damage yourreach the public? Why is so much hidden from the
knees. Never hold your breath during exercise.fitness professional or physique athlete? Is there a
Aerobic training is essential for cardiac health.conspiracy which prevents one from finding out
Ballistic stretches are harmful. Straight knee situpswhat is fact and fallacy? Does it suit mass
damage your lower back. Weight lifting slows youcirculation magazines, equipment manufacturers
down and makes you stiff. Lactic acid causesand medical groups to allow most of us to remain
stiffness. Resistance training is bad for children.in relative ignorance?
And so on and so forth.Many of the answers to these questions lie in the
If you are in the fitness, wellness or physiqueimage projected by high profile individuals, sports
professions, you will have heard these declarationsheroes, companies and organisations who talk on
and many more. The emergence of fitness andbehalf of the fitness, physique and sports
personal training as a discrete profession has bredprofessions. Very often these self-appointed
a host of rules and guidelines, many of which areauthorities become shining examples of the saying
contradictory and confusing for the personalthat \"a little knowledge is a dangerous thing\",
trainer, aerobics instructor, bodybuilder and sportsyet, sadly, most of their intended audience
coach. The newcomer and veteran alike arebecome committed disciples because they
justified in not knowing what to accept and whatgenerally are not interested in scratching any
to discard. Much of the time they opt for thedeeper than the surface.
information disseminated in popular fitnessMany exercise scientists and medical professionals
magazines and at fashionable fitness conventions.do not fare much better in this department, even
Even then, information which disagrees withthough they have the training and the means to
existing dogma usually is ignored or dismisseddispel many of the myths and misconceptions
because the majority or commercialised view hasassociated with fitness and health. Some of them
become firmly entrenched as the reigning fitnessextol the virtues of isokinetic or constant velocity
or physique religion.machines for rehabilitation or testing, even though
The \'thou shalts and thou shalt nots\' of fitnessit is scientifically impossible to construct a constant
are blindly adhered to with greater fervour thanvelocity machine. Others warn against
the Ten Commandments of the Bible. Fewbreath-holding even during heavy weight lifting,
practitioners ever question the source or validitydespite the fact that the Valsalva manoeuvre
of this fitness religion, nor are they encouraged toprotects the back during lifting. Many accept
do so, because this would undermine the authorityincorrect concepts such as isotonic exercise
of many fitness organisations, sports equipment(which implies constant muscle tension). Or they
companies and fitness professionals. The positionbelieve that shoes diminish the likelihood of impact
in bodybuilding is just as confusing, since theinjuries or that aerobic training is the best way of
newcomer has to choose between thousands ofreducing the risks of heart disease. Some still
different routines promoted by hosts ofconsider that resistance training is contraindicated
prominent champions of gargantuan proportions,for children and older adults.
glossy bodybuilding magazines and persuasiveThe majority tend to regard strength training as
equipment manufacturers. In many respects, thebeing far less important than cardiovascular
world of fitness, bodybuilding and sports trainingtraining, even though most adults in the world
has yet to emerge from its Dark Ages, despiterequire far more strength-related fitness and
the fact that modern science is applying highlyagility than aerobic fitness for executing their daily
sophisticated methods to produce sometasks. Many accept the contention that agonist
extremely exciting findings about the human bodymuscle action is always controlled by opposing
and mind.action by the \'antagonists\'. Few realise that the
Why this apparent paradox? Why is fitness andheart serves as an endocrine gland as well as a
physique training so primitive in so manypump. The majority are unaware that the
respects? Why does it incorporate so few of thehypertrophy produced by bodybuilding can be
discoveries of modern science? Why is the fitnessdifferent from that produced by weightlifting. For
profession regarded as a low level profession,that matter, many of them do not even know
practised by those who cannot pass a seriousthe difference between weightlifting, powerlifting
degree at a university or could not make it in theand bodybuilding. Indeed, many fallacies abound in
real world of business? Why is there a hugethe apparently objective and scientific world of
collection of damaging fallacies that rarely seem tomedicine as well!