Motorbike Helmet Laws, Human Behaviour & The Organ Donor Effect

Should motorcycle riders have the right to choosehave been delayed on the organ waiting list. Note
to wear or not to wear a motorbike helmet? It isthat it is not a one to one relationship, but rather
a fiercely debated topic among bikers, politiciansthree riders have to die to save one person in
and recently the people of Missouri.need of an organ.
It's a 'freedom of choice' debate for many,The argument against helmet laws citing the
questioning why the legislators feel they knowOrgan Donor Effect tends to be along the lines of
what individuals need better than themselves. It isthat the enactment of crash helmet laws will
also a scale issue, how extensive should laws bereduce the number of organ donations every
to protect life and where should the line beyear causing a corresponding increase in the
drawn? Laws state that an individual is not allowednumber of deaths on the organ waiting list.
to intentionally end their own life, helmet lawsAn argument for helmet laws citing the Organ
attempt to reduce the risk of death, how far willDonor Effect is statistically stronger, consider that
legislators go to protect life and what effect willfor every three biker deaths, only one persons
this have on the quality of life for the individual?life in need of an organ will be saved (extended).
Of course it isn't that simple, we're not all onlySo unless the lives of bikers are somehow less
individuals but together we make up a society andimportant than everyone else, the Organ Donor
sometimes the actions of individuals can haveEffect as an argument for, or against motorbike
positive and negative effects on other individualshelmet legislation is irrelevant.
and on wider society.Butterfly Effect - Actions can have reactions
So the debate widens to consider costs andfurther away than may initially be considered. The
benefits to society. I'm not going to go into thisOrgan Donor Effect when considering motorcycle
area in detail because most of the costs andhelmet legislation is an interesting example of a
benefits have already been widely discussedButterfly Effect. The use of helmets don't only
previously. Considerations include the immediateeffect those immediately involved in a motorcycle
loss of life to a rider who is involved in a fatalaccident, but can also effect third parties which
accident, any pillion rider who is unfortunateyou would not immediately consider - those on
enough to be involved, and any other parties whoorgan donor waiting lists. But just because there is
are involved in the accident. Pillion riders, likea relationship, doesn't mean it is an important
passengers in car accidents form a sad statisticrelationship and doesn't mean that it deserves to
as the accident is normally completely outside ofbe considered in the debate.
their control, yet they bear the sameMore serious helmet law considerations should be
consequences. Considerations also include hospitalaround half helmets and other minimalistic helmets
services, police investigations, legal inquiries, andwhich offer questionable protection. If these
road clean up and repair work. Individual freedomhelmet styles qualify as adequate protection under
of choice should hold strong consideration, and thelaw, but do not actually adequately protect the
fact that the use or non-use of a motorcyclehuman head in a motorcycle accident. It begs the
helmet doesn't directly effect the health ofquestion of whether there is any point to having
anyone else other than themselves (ignoring thethe helmet laws in the first place.
Organ Donor Effect).In most debates that consider individual choice
The Organ Donor Effect - Mitigating the cost ofversus legislative control I personally favour
motorcycle accidents on society? It isn't a newindividual choice.
concept, but one that has received revivedBut in this debate I considered two ideas, firstly
publicity lately following the Missouri motorbikewhether motorcycle helmets are a good thing for
helmet law saga. For me the relationship betweenpeople to wear and secondly whether individuals
motorcycle accidents and organ donations ishave the capability to choose for themselves
interesting because people will use the sameuninfluenced by other people. In this situation after
relationship to argue both for and against crashmuch thought I decided that given the choice I
helmet laws. You can even find motorcyclistswould vote in favour of compulsory helmet laws
citing the relationship in their arguments againstfor all ages. Because when helmet use becomes
motorcycle helmet laws. This multi use of thethe norm there is no longer a question of
same argument is interesting, any use of thewhether it is cooler to ride with or without a
argument is in fact bizarre because the effecthelmet, everyone just wears one. Ideally I would
implies different values on the lives oflike there to be no helmet laws and every
motorcyclists compared to humans on the organindividual able to make his or her own choice, but
donation waiting list. Are not the lives of allunfortunately I don't believe the individuals would
humans valued equally? Of course they are not, ifbe able to make their own choice, but rather be
they were politicians would not be sending ourinfluenced too heavily by media, other riders, and
young men to war but be going themselves, butthe individual's perception of what is 'cool'. Peer
that is off topic. So what is the Organ Donorpressure is commonly considered a child and
Effect? Statistics show a relationship existsteenager issue but I believe it is simply a human
between motorbike helmet use and the numbercharacteristic. To want to do as others do, the
of fatal motorcycle accidents from head trauma.desire to be accepted, desire to fit in, desire to
Compulsory helmet laws increase helmet use,stand out. I believe that the majority of riders
causing a corresponding decrease in rider fatalities.given the option of wearing a helmet or not would
The Organ Donor Effect is the statisticalbase their decision on what they believe others
relationship between a decrease in head traumawould think of them (what image they will
related motorcycle rider fatalities and aportray). It is this unfortunate human
corresponding decrease in healthy organ donations.characteristic that moves me in support of
Motorcycle riders tend to be young and healthycompulsory motorbike helmet laws.
and have an above average likelihood of providingIf everyone was not influenced by everyone else,
healthy organs following death from head trauma.then people would be capable of thinking for
Statistics have shown that for every motorcyclethemselves and all self respecting individuals would
accident fatality from head trauma, 0.33 deathswear motorcycle crash helmets anyway.