Should Ph.D.s Be Referred To As

In recent years, I've frequently heard people claimshould we bend over backwards and let their
that individuals who hold PhDs are not "real"misperceptions rule? Would it not be better to
doctors. These people assert that only physicianseducate people on the historical, established usage
can rightfully claim this title, and that it'sof this term--usage that persists to this day?
inappropriate for PhD-holders to use this term.Some say, "If you refer to a PhD-holder as
Frankly, I'm surprised. I thought it was common'Doctor Smith,' then people will assume that he's a
knowledge that there are both medical andphysician. So what happens if there's a medical
non-medical doctors, and that this is a legitimateemergency? Do you want people running to
term to use in both situations. Apparently though,Smith for medical help?" Frankly, I think that this
common knowledge isn't always as common asargument betrays a low opinion of the public's
one would hope. For this reason, I'd like to take aintelligence; it assumes that people are too
moment to dispel some of the myths behind thisdim-witted to learn, and that we may as well
title. (For the sake of brevity, I shall henceforthaccept the inevitable. Personally,I would rather
focus on the PhD degree; however, the samefight ignorance gently than assume such a lowly
arguments hold for comparable degrees such asopinion of the common man's intellience. Would
the ScD and the ThD).some people continue to think that only physicians
Can PhDs legitimately claim to be doctors?merit this title? Probably so--but I suspect that
Absolutely! The term "doctor" is derived from thethe vast majority of individuals are intelligent
Latin verb docere, which means "to teach."enough to learn otherwise.
Historically, it refers to a teacher or, by extension,For some reason, many also think that the MD is
a scholar. It did not specifically refer to a physician.much more difficult to attain than a PhD. I can
This title was later co-opted by the medicalunderstand why; after all, we've all heard horror
community though, due to the respect andstories about medical students working long hours
prestige that it imputes. In one of life's greatand stayin up all through the night. However,
ironies, many uninformed laypeople now percievepeople simply don't realize how laborious a PhD
the medical degree to be more prestigious thanprogram can be. PhD students often have to
the lowly PhD, declaring that people who haveengage in long hours of grueling studies and
earned the latter are "not real doctors."research if they wish to complete their studies in
Some people say, "Well, most people only think ofa timely fashion. I'd say that when it comes to
physicians as doctors. According to the rules ofyears of study, PhD programs are more
common usage then, PhD-holders shouldn't usedemanding as well; when starting from a
this title." I understand the appeal of thisbachelor's degree, a PhD typically takes from six
argument, but frankly, I think it's fallacious. Thereto eight years to complete, as opposed to four
are many individuals that are known to the publicyears for the medical degree.
as "Doctor"--Dr. Martin Luther King, Dr. JoyceWhen someone declares that physicians are the
Brothers and Dr. Laura Schlessinger. None ofonly real doctors, he is simply mistaken. I'd say
these individuals has a medical degree, and yetthat PhDs have every right to this title--and I say
they are commonly accorded this title.that based on the title's etymology, the demands
Moreover, I think that this argument panders toof their programs and the accepted,
ignorance, rather than fighting it. If a large portioncontemporary usage of this term, even outside
of the population thinks that (or acts as though)of academic circles.
only MD-holders truly merit the title of "doctor,"