Step Out and Smoke: The Smoking Ban in Public Places

Numerous solutions to the problem of smokingsmoke, or quit smoking, which is easier done in an
have been proposed and tried. This is due toenvironment where a quitter does not have to be
staggering reports of increased risks of tobaccoreminded so often of, or does not have to
smoking related diseases and worldwide deathsbreathe in, his past habit.
reaching up to 3 million people a year. SomeImplementation and effectiveness
countries have resorted to banning smoking inThere is guaranteed way of finding out if banning
public places such as cafes, pubs, and restaurants.smoking in public places is the only solution to the
In Norway, where tobacco advertising has beensmoking problem in the United States. If we look
banned for thirty years and a pack of cigarettesat other countries we will see different results.
costs £6, one in three people smoke andAnd there will always be opposition, whatever the
there has been an increase in tobacco relatedfinal decision will be. It is up to the government to
deaths. In Canada, where graphic images of thedecide on what to prioritize: the health, safety and
damage done to internal organs by cigarettewellbeing of its citizens, or the freedom of choice?
smoking cover cigarette packs, smoking levelsAnd once it has finally been decided upon, its
are some of the lowest in the world. In Ireland,success will largely depend on its implementation.
where a strict anti-smoking legislation has beenThere is fear that even some officers will not
introduced, most smokers have observed withoutenforce it, just like what happened in Scotland.
much contest. Different countries have producedYet in Ireland, regional health boards are involved
different results as they ban smoking in publicin the enforcement of the ban. They can take
places. The question is: will it work for us, too? Isaway licenses from premises ignoring the ban and
a smoking ban necessary and effective? Who willimpose fines.
actually implement it?Extreme vs. alternative measures
Pros and cons of banning smoking in public placesBanning what could be the world's biggest
There are several advantages to banning smokingaddiction or industry is an extreme measure, so
in public places. It's going to help governmentextreme positive and negative responses are met
agencies dealing with air pollution and health. It'sexpectations. To present it more pleasantly to
going to earn money in countries where fines forpeople and to generate more favourable results,
individuals and premises where smoking is caughtsome countries slowly implement the ban through
is imposed. It's going to reduce the risk ofcompromises. Pubs can be 80% smoke-free.
incurring smoking related diseases and the colossalOthers group the same kind of businesses
number of smoking related deaths which is thetogether, so different types of businesses will
threat behind the issue. And it also means allowingimplement it at different times - a slow but
non-smokers the freedom to exercise their rightsteady implementation, some sort of shock
to clean air and healthy lungs, which gets steppedabsorber. Advertising can also be utilized to
on every time they inhale involuntary smoke.advertise the health effects not just on cigarette
Some against it would say that it is bad forpacks but also in print and TV.
business, since some smokers' responses haveThe government can not, despite allegations,
been they would rather drink and smoke ataltogether remove personal freedom. It can only
home. But in countries where the ban has alreadydo so much as to prevent non-smokers from
been implemented, businesses did not wane andsuffering the ill effects of actions they did not
some have actually gained wider support. If allcommit. A ban on smoking in public places, or
businesses implement the ban, then they leaveother alternative measure, might just enhance
consumers with "virtually" no choice - simply stepone's awareness of the rights of other people, or
outside a pub or bar every time they want toimprove the use of one's freedom.