To Agree Or Not to Agree, Is That the Question?

Pool locker room. Early morning. My buddy Janetdisagreed with Janet and entered into a friendly
and I in conversation.debate about the benefits and disadvantages of
Janet says, "... and isn't it great that thecommunity vs. corporate ownership. But this could
community might resume ownership of thehave led me to try to win the argument instead
hospital again?" Our privately-owned local hospitalof gain information and understanding.
might become a community hospital again. Janet'sAsk a Question
question seemed to call for agreement. But notBut in choosing the third approach: to ask a
being informed about the issue, I wasn't sure Iquestion, I exercised openness and curiosity. I
could agree. So I asked her, "Would that be aloved the spaciousness of being open to
good thing, do you think? I don't know enough towhatever Janet had to say. I enjoyed not taking
say one way or the other." Janet then gaveand defending a position, not feeling trapped by
several reasons why she thought communityOption 1 or Option 2. And what I took away from
ownership would be good for patients, thethe locker room that morning was this: I want to
community, and the region. I was impressed withremember to ask more open, honest, generative
her understanding of the potential benefits.questions, whether I agree or disagree with the
When I got home, I was still pondering this Kispeaker.
Moment. The control of our nearby regionalThat morning with Janet also reminded me, when
hospital is a hot topic. Though Janet and I areI do ask a question, I need to be sure it really is a
friends, the conversation might have become aquestion not a statement in disguise. Instead of "...
debate if I'd had a strong, opposite opinion. Butisn't it great that the community might regain
my interest lies not in the topic but in consideringownership...?" consider: "What do you think about
the possible responses to Janet's remark:I couldthe hospital reverting back to community
have agreed, disagreed, or asked a question.ownership?" Especially in more sensitive situations,
Agree or Disagree?assumptions tend to close off dialogue and can be
Why didn't I just agree? It would have beendisrespectful and even dangerous.
easier. I didn't have a strong opinion. Plus, the wayAs I practice the art of conversation, I
the remark was phrased indicated that myincreasingly appreciate the power of non-directive
agreement was taken for granted. This causedquestions to open dialogue, diffuse thorny issues,
me to ponder, How often do I agree because it'sand teach us about each other. I find it better not
expedient? Even without all the facts, I doto presume to know what my conversation
sometimes. The benefits are numerous--mypartner is thinking, feeling, or hoping. I'd rather
friend and I stay in synch; we avoid a lengthierinquire in a way that allows her to reflect and
and perhaps more contentious conversation, and Ianswer honestly, rather than feel she has to
move on agreeably to the rest of my day. Butagree, hold back, or debate.
what are the problems with just agreeing? I don'tHow we talk to each other is how we create our
learn anything; I lose the opportunity for deeperrelationships, and our workplaces, and our
dialogue and understanding of the situation and ofcommunities. Questions offered from a state of
my friend. And I leave an impression oftrue inquiry offer a rich and interesting place to
agreement where it doesn't exist.start. What genuine question will you ask
Choosing the second possibility, I would havesomeone today?