United Healthcare Seeks Greater Control Over Health Insurance Costs

There is no doubt that health insurance can bethe issue is that their noncompliance penalties are
costly. Both health insurance companies andrarely enforced, or relatively minor.
medical providers share some of the blame forOn the other hand, United Healthcare's proposed
that. In general, patients have been caught in thepenalty is significant. If hospitals fail to notify them
middle: doctors and hospitals charge healthof an admission in time, they will forfeit 50% of
insurers higher fees for services, which insurerstheir reimbursment for treatment. That will cost
then pass onto the consumer. Reimbursementthem up to $20,000 for a joint replacement or
rates are negotiated periodically, normally without$25,000 for bypass surgery. Being reimbursed for
controversy. However, United Healthcare is nowonly half of the care they provide could make
playing hardball with a group of New Yorktreating patients with United Healthcare health
hospitals.insurance unaffordable. As a result, nearly 85,000
Continuum Health Partners runs five majorUnited Health Care patients may no longer be able
hospitals in the New York City area. Their facilitiesto use their individual health insurance coverage at
include St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center andContinuum hospitals.
Beth Israel Medical Center. United Health Care isWhy would United Healthcare make this move,
insisting on a stringent notification standard:which has the potential to anger customers? It is
specifically, that the health insurance company bea matter of cutting costs. Healthcare reform may
notified of a patient's admission to a hospital withinestablish exchange markets to encourage price
24 hours. From United Healthcare's perspective,competition among health insurance companies,
prices will go down while the quality of caremaking cost reduction imperative for United
improves. That is because a United case managerHealth Care and other health insurers. Meanwhile,
would be able to get involved quicker and controleven scaled-back proposals would forbid insurers
costs. For example, they would be able to ensurefrom denying individual health insurance policies to
that the hospital is using approved, effectivepeople with pre-existing conditions. Doing so is
treatments that will be reimbursed--as opposed tocurrently one of the most common ways for
those that may not be covered by the healthprivate insurance companies to keep costs down.
insurance plan.Therefore, the strict notification standard is a
Understandably, physicians and other hospital staffway to compensate for the potential shutdown
are leery of allowing health insurance companiesof that revenue stream.
inject employees with little or no actual medicalFor its part, United Healthcare claims that
experience into the decision-making process.Continuum was becoming too greedy in its
Hospital groups in other states have alsodemand for increased reimbursement rates.
expressed objections to the onerousContinuum claims that United has negotiated
administrative burden, as well as the lack ofexceptions to the notification requirement with
accomodation for short-staffed facilities duringlarge hospital groups, instead squeezing the smaller
holidays and weekends. Besides those issues, whyguys for income. While United and major hospital
is the requirement for timely notification sogroups have declined to disclose whether or not
controversial? You would think that individualsuch immunity exists, it is likely. After all, the small
health insurance providers, such as United Healthpercentage of United Health Care policyholders
Care, already have such requirements. Technically,who use Continuum hospitals is a drop in the
many of them already do (although some otherbucket compared to their million-plus individual
major insurers, like Blue Cross Blue Shield, do not);health insurance policyholders in New York.